Evidence Hub

Comparative estimate of glucose-lowering therapies on risk of incident pneumonia and severe sepsis: an analysis of real-world cohort data

A. Henney, David R. Riley, T. Hydes, M. Anson, G. Ibarburu, F. Frost, U. Alam, D. Cuthbertson

Thorax, 2024

352 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Beyond glucose-lowering and cardiorenal protection, these drugs may protect against pneumonia and sepsis. Aims This study assesses the impact of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs on the risk of incident pneumonia and severe sepsis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using anonymised electronic medical records from TriNetX, a global federated database. Two intention-to-treat analyses were performed, each with two cohorts of adult T2D patients. The first analysis compared individuals prescribed SGLT2i, and the second individuals prescribed GLP-1 RAs, with those prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). An active comparator new user design was used, with outcomes defined as time-to-incident pneumonia and severe sepsis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to control for potential confounders, and patients were followed for 12 months. Secondary analyses compared SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs against other glucose-lowering therapies. Results After propensity score matching, 352 687 patients were included in the SGLT2i versus DPP-4i comparison. SGLT2i treatment was associated with a risk reduction in incident pneumonia (HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.73, 0.78)) and severe sepsis (0.75 (0.73, 0.77)). In the GLP-1 RA versus DPP-4i comparison, 331 863 patients were included. GLP-1 RA treatment was associated with a risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 352 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free