Evidence Hub

Elevated systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with stroke-associated pneumonia in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study

Ting-Ting Duan, Ming Yang, Yi-Ming Zhang, Chun-Yan Zhu, Zi-Chen Rao

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

1,767 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a frequent complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) that contributes to poor clinical outcomes. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), derived from neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts, may reflect post-stroke immune imbalance, but its role in predicting SAP remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 1,767 AIS patients and evaluated the association between log₂-transformed SII and the occurrence of SAP using multivariable logistic regression, generalized additive models, and two-piecewise regression. SAP developed in 21.3% of patients during hospitalization. Higher SII levels were independently associated with increased SAP risk after adjustment for age, sex, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and dysphagia assessed by Kubota Water Drinking Test (KWDT). Patients in the highest SII quartile had a significantly greater likelihood of developing SAP compared to those in the lowest quartile (adjusted odds ratio = 2.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.21–3.38, p = 0.0069). A non-linear, threshold-dependent relationship was identified, with SAP risk increasing substantially beyond log₂-SII ≈ 8.5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated moderate predictive performance of SII for SAP (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.726), while C-reactive protein (CRP) showed superior discrimination (AUC = 0.826 p < 0.0001). Supplementary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,767 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free