Evidence Hub

Association of serum A20 levels with stroke-associated pneumonia, early neurological deterioration, and poor neurological prognosis following acute supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study

Chao Tang, Wei Li, Suijun Zhu, Min Zhang, Gao-Feng Xiong, Yi-Juan Lin

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

243 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background A20 is an endogenous protective protein. We quantified serum A20 levels following acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and assessed their association with the severity of illness and clinical outcomes of patients. Methods In total, 243 patients with acute supratentorial ICH and 76 controls were included in this prospective cohort study. Serum A20 levels were measured at admission in all patients, at study entry in all controls, and on post-ICH days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 in 76 patients. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and hematoma volume were used to estimate the severity. Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP), early neurological deterioration (END), and post-ICH 6-month poor prognosis (modified Rankin Scale scores: 3–6) were considered as the three outcome variables of interest. Results Patients, as opposed to controls, exhibited significantly heightened serum A20 levels from admission until 14 days following ICH, with a peak value at day 3. Serum A20 levels at all-time points after ICH, which were significantly correlated with NIHSS scores and hematoma volume, were significantly higher in patients with END, SAP, or poor prognosis than in those without the corresponding one. Serum A20 levels at admission possessed similar predictive ability of these clinical outcomes to those at other time points. Serum A20 levels at admission, along with initial NIHSS scores and hematoma volume, remained independent predictors of clinical outcomes among…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 243 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free