Evidence Hub

Identification of subtypes and construction of a predictive model for novel subtypes in severe community-acquired pneumonia based on clinical metagenomics: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study

Shiyi Chen, Yong-Po Jiang, Dongqing Lv, Ye Zheng, Ruihai Zhang, Hanzhi Dai, Ziyi Wang, Shu-Ya Li et al.

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2025

1,051 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective It is well recognized that high heterogeneity represents a key driver of the elevated mortality in severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP). Precise subtype classification is therefore critical for both treatment strategy formulation and prognostic evaluation in this patient population. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for novel clinical subtypes of sCAP, leveraging microbiome profiles identified via metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolled adult patients with sCAP who underwent clinical mNGS testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in intensive care units (ICUs) across 17 medical centers in China. Based on mNGS-identified microbiome characteristics, unsupervised machine learning (UML) was employed for clustering analysis of sCAP patients. LASSO regression and random forest (RF) algorithms were applied to screen and identify predictors of novel sCAP subtypes. A predictive model for the new clinical subtypes was constructed according to the screening results, with a nomogram generated. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, respectively. Results A total of 1,051 sCAP patients were included in the final analysis. The 28-day all-cause mortality rate was 45% (473/1,051). UML clustering identified two distinct sCAP subtypes: the 28-day mortality rate was 42.19% (343/813) in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,051 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free