Evidence Hub

Development and validation of mortality risk prediction model for sepsis secondary to pneumonia at intensive care unit admission: a retrospective case-cohort study

Xiao-Liang Li, Xiao-Li Lei, Lijie Kou, Junli Wang, Zhi-Gang Yang

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

1,337 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background To establish a noninvasive mortality risk prediction model for sepsis secondary to pneumonia (SSP) and validate the model in the prediction of mortality risk in SSP patients at hospital admission. Methods A retrospective cohort of SSP patients were recruited from January 2017 to December 2020 at the Henan Provincial People’s Hospital. Clinical data were collected at admission. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression were used to construct a prognosis prediction model. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Another retrospective cohort with SSP was recruited from January 2021 to July 2022 at the same hospital to validate the model. Results A total of 1,337 patients were screened, including 941 patients in the derivation cohort and 396 patients in the validation cohort. The model included age, white blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, arterial oxygen pressure / fraction inspired oxygen, D-dimer and vasoactive drug use. The area under ROC curve of derivation model was better than sequential organ failure assessment score and APACHE II score (0.777 vs. 0.600 vs. 0.625, p < 0.05). Besides, the proposed model had a significantly higher prediction performance than SOFA and APACHE II scores in the validation cohort (0.803 vs. 0.655 vs. 0.688, p < 0.05). The prediction model was publicly released as an online calculator. Conclusion A…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,337 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free