Evidence Hub

Long-Term Bedridden Status as a Predictor of in-Hospital Mortality in Older Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Zheng Wang, Dong Wu

Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2025

453 participants

Abstract

Background Long-term bedridden elderly individuals face a high risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) amid China’s aging population, yet the specific mortality impact remains insufficiently studied. Objective To compare the clinical characteristics and in-hospital mortality between long-term bedridden and ambulatory elderly patients with CAP, and to identify risk factors for mortality. Methods This retrospective study included 453 patients aged ≥75 years hospitalized with CAP from March 2016 to March 2019, divided into a bedridden group (n = 162) and a non-bedridden group (n = 291). Data on demographics, comorbidities, frailty (modified Frailty Index-5, mFI-5), functional status (Barthel Index), and laboratory parameters (eg, hs-CRP) were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. Results The bedridden group had a significantly higher mortality rate (27.16% vs 2.06%, P < 0.001) and elevated hs-CRP levels (40.2 ± 44.0 mg/L vs 19.9 ± 20.3 mg/L). Multivariate analysis identified bedridden status (OR = 11.99, 95% CI: 4.31–33.40), respiratory failure (OR = 6.80, 95% CI: 3.03–15.28), and renal dysfunction (elevated serum creatinine; OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02) as independent risk factors for mortality. Conclusion Long-term bedridden status is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in elderly CAP patients with inflammatory response potentially playing a critical role.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 453 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free