Evidence Hub

Impact of COVID-19 on sputum isolates and hospital outcomes among patients with pneumonia in Sheffield, United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study

Patrick Copley, Emmanuel Firima, Natasha James, Matthew Saunders, David Partridge, Joby Cole

Frontiers in Public Health, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background and aim The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 severely affected healthcare globally. Strong links have been suggested between the pandemic and changes in the epidemiology of organisms responsible for non-COVID-19 pneumonia. In this study, we examined temporal changes in organisms recovered from sputum culture, integrating laboratory data from all submitted sputum specimens with clinical data from a subset of patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Method A retrospective study was conducted from August 2017 to May 2024 using data derived from samples from healthcare centres in Sheffield including hospitals, general practices, hospices and other palliative care settings. August 2017 to March 2020, April 2020 to September 2022, and October 2022 to May 2024 were defined as before, during, and after COVID-19 periods, respectively. Absolute percentage-point change in the distribution of organisms was performed at genera level. Results A total of 50,827 culture positive isolate episodes from sputum samples were analysed during the study period, of which 25,085 (45.4%; 783.9 isolate episodes per month), 11,644 (22.9%; 388.1 isolate episodes per month) and 14,098 (27.7%; 704.9 isolate episodes per month) were obtained before, during and after COVID-19, respectively. Overall, the commonest cultured genus were Haemophilus sp. (21,229/50,827, 41.8%), Pseudomonas sp. (5,504/50827, 10.8%), and Streptococcus sp. (4,893/50,827, 9.6%). Haemophilus sp.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free