Evidence Hub

Epidemiology and perioperative factors contributing to postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective Chinese study

Yuxiao Zhan, Yang Yang, Jian Zhang, Rui Yang, Guojun Zhang

Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2025

381 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background: Despite the existent studies investigating the risk factors for postoperative pneumonia (POP) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the comprehensive understanding of POP is constrained by the scarcity of epidemiological data. Objective: To investigate the epidemiology and contributing factors of POP in patients undergoing isolated CABG, and establish a prediction model. Design: A single center, retrospective case-control study. Setting: Seven cardiovascular surgery wards across three campuses of a large general hospital in Henan Province, Mid-China. Participants: Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent isolated CABG between January 1, 2020 and November 30, 2023. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analyses with restricted cubic splines (RCS) were performed to identify factors that independently contributed to POP and explore the potential nonlinear relationships. The prediction model was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: POP occurred in 11.34% of patients (518/4569). A total of 416 pathogenic strains were isolated from 381 patients, predominantly Gram-negative bacteria (86.5%). Pathogen distribution varied annually and quarterly. Multivariate analyses indicated that age, diabetes mellitus, smoking, operative duration, red blood cell transfusion, and duration of mechanical ventilation were significantly associated with higher POP risk, whereas higher hemoglobin and total cholesterol levels indicated a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 381 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free