Evidence Hub

Successful Management of Occult Breast Cancer with a Background of Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5 Antibody-Positive Interstitial Pneumonia: A Case Report

M. Ishii, Y. Horimoto, Yoichi Koyama, Kayo Adachi, Ai Ueda, T. Kawate, H. Kaise, Kimito Yamada et al.

Surgery Case Reports, 2025

Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Anti-MDA5 (melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis is a severe subtype of dermatomyositis associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, which carries an extremely high mortality rate. Prompt diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are crucial for survival. Here, we report a rare case of occult breast cancer in a patient with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive associated interstitial pneumonia. Following the control of the lung disease with immunosuppressive therapy, the patient successfully underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and curative surgery. CASE PRESENTATION A 63-year-old woman presented with progressive dyspnea. Imaging tests revealed diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs and enlarged left axillary lymph nodes. Blood tests showed elevated KL-6 levels and anti-MDA5 antibodies. Although no skin lesions or myositis were observed, she was diagnosed with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive associated interstitial pneumonia. Immunosuppressive therapy, including steroid pulse therapy, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide pulse therapy, and plasma exchange, was initiated, leading to an improvement in her lung condition. She was then initially referred to the department of plastic surgery for further evaluation of the enlarged left axillary lymph node. Excisional biopsy of the enlarged left axillary lymph node revealed triple-negative occult breast cancer (cTXN1M0, Stage IIA). After the patient was referred to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free