Evidence Hub

A quality assessment of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and management of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review

Kairui Wan, Hengrui Liang, Guolin Yan, Bangyu Zou, Chuxin Huang, Mei Jiang

Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2019

15 citations

Abstract

Background: Numerous evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) pertaining to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) have been published by domestic and international organizations, but their qualities have not been reported. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed up to July 2018 for relevant guidelines. Guidelines were eligible for inclusion if they incorporated recommendation statements for prevention and/or management in adults or children with VAP and were developed on a systematic evidence-based method. Four reviewers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, which comprises 23 items organized into six domains in addition to two overall items. Results: Thirteen EBGs were identified for review. An overall high degree of agreement among reviewers was reached [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.885; 95% CI, 0.862–0.905] during their review. The scores (mean, range) for the six AGREE domains were: scope and purpose (61%, 51–74%), stakeholder involvement (36%, 18–68%), rigor of development (41%, 22–59%), clarity and presentation (56%, 47–71%), applicability (38%, 21–59%) and editorial independence (50%, 0–77%). Only two EBGs (15.4%) were rated “recommended” for clinical practice. Approximately 86% of recommendations were based on moderate or low levels of evidence (levels B–D were 46.2%, 19.0%, and 21.2%, respectively). The recommendations for prevention and management of VAP were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free