Evidence Hub

Molecular detection of mecA and lukSF-PV in patients with Staphylococcus aureus soft tissue infections in a tertiary hospital setting, Calabar, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

Christian J. Ide, G. I. Ogban, B. Ekeng, U. E. Emanghe, A. Onukak, A. A. Iwuafor, U. Udoh, S. Chukwuma et al.

Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 2025

360 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) is one of the major virulence factors known to be associated with invasive, life-threatening Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) soft tissue infections. Several studies have shown that methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) are carriers of the lukSF-PV; however, data describing their prevalence and distribution in the Nigerian setting are sparse in the literature, and thus informed the need for the current study. Objective: We aimed to detect mecA and analysed the risk factors associated with lukSF-PV-producing S. aureus wound infections. Design: This was a single-centre hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study conducted between March 2019 and September 2019 at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. Methods: Aspirates from participants with soft tissue infections were cultured, and all isolates of S. aureus were tested for the presence of lukSF-PV using endpoint polymerase chain reaction. The mecA was also detected, and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed. Results: Eighty S. aureus isolates were identified from 360 participants. Of the eighty, 47 (58.8%) were MRSA and 10 (12.5%) were lukSF-PV-producing S. aureus strains. Of the ten, six were MSSA and four were MRSA, but the difference was not statistically significant. A significant association was observed between lukSF-PV-producing S. aureus-infected wounds and recurrent skin infections (p =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 360 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free