Evidence Hub

Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress with Ramatroban, a Thromboxane A2 and Prostaglandin D2 Receptor Antagonist: A 4-Patient Case Series Report

M. L. Ogletree, R. Kulshreshta, A. Agarwal, K. Chiang, A. Gupta

C59. POTRERO HILL: CASE REPORTS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION, 2022

19 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Lungs in COVID-19 patients produce lipid mediators measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), notably thromboxane B2 (TxB2) >> prostaglandin E2 > prostaglandin D2 (PGD2).1 High levels of TxA2 metabolites in BALF from COVID-19 associated ARDS,1 and systemically in non- ICU COVID-19 patients2,3 led us to propose a critical role for TxA2 prostanoid receptors (TPr) in COVID-19 respiratory distress. We hypothesized that TxA2/TPr signaling in airways, pulmonary microvasculature, and veins contributes to pulmonary edema and hypoxemia in COVID-19 pneumonia. TPr signaling contracts intrapulmonary veins with 10-fold higher potency than arteries.4 High concentrations of TxA2 impede pulmonary venous blood flow, increase microvascular pressure, and force fluid into alveoli.4 TPr signaling also activates platelets and triggers tissue factor expression on monocytes, which may contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19. A TPr antagonist was previously reported to decrease pulmonary capillary pressure by selectively reducing post-capillary resistance in patients with acute lung injury.5 PGD2 stimulation of Dprostanoid receptor 2 (DPr2, aka CRTH2) suppresses interferon lambda (IFN-λ) transcription in the upper respiratory tract in response to respiratory viruses. PGD2/DPr2 antagonism boosts local IFN- λ antiviral responses and limits viral replication.6 Antagonism of TxA2/TPr and PGD2/DPr2 signaling has been proposed for antiviral, antithrombotic and immunomodulatory action in COVID- 19.7…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free