Evidence Hub

Adenomatous hyperplasia induced by chronic cherry pit retention mimicking an endobronchial tumor-case series and systematic review of literature

G. Oruqaj, Gabriele A. Krombach, S. Gattenloehner, S. Herold, I. Vadász, Werner Seeger, K. Tello, Matthias Hecker

Frontiers in Medicine, 2024

Abstract

Introduction Endobronchial foreign body aspiration is not common in adults, but it is a life-threatening event. Recurrent pneumonias by chronic retention of foreign body often lead to initial medical presentation of the patient. However, lymphoplasmacellular bronchitis with adenomatous hyperplasia and squamous epithelium metaplasia with complete or partial blockage of lobar bronchus mimicking lung tumor is rare in literature, and this particular condition is often misdiagnosed. Case presentation we report our experience in the diagnostic and management of two elderly patients with recurrent pneumonia, admitted in hospital for further examination. In both patients, with no history of aspiration, the cherry pit was detected during bronchoscopy and recanalization with flexible cryoprobe, surrounded by purulent secretion, occluding completely the right upper lobe in the first case, and partially the left lower lobe associated with persistent actinomycosis in the second case, with signs of local inflammation, bronchial adenomatous hyperplasia mimicking lung tumor at initial bronchoscopic examination. Histology showed a lymphoplasmacellullar bronchitis with adenomatous hyperplasia and squamous epithelium metaplasia because of chronic retention of foreign body. Conclusion Bronchoscopy examination should be considered in cases where there is an unresolved chronic cough with recurrent pneumonia or persistent actinomycosis in patients with high risk. Cryoprobe is a safe and feasible…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free