Evidence Hub

Effect of low-to-moderate hyperoxia on lung injury in preclinical animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S. Minkove, R. Dhamapurkar, Xi-Zhong Cui, Yan Li, Jun-Feng Sun, D. Cooper, P. Eichacker, Parizad Torabi-Parizi

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 2023

6 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Background Extensive animal investigation informed clinical practice regarding the harmful effects of high fractional inspired oxygen concentrations (FiO_2s > 0.60). Since questions persist whether lower but still supraphysiologic FiO_2 ≤ 0.60 and > 0.21 (FiO_2 ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21) are also harmful with inflammatory lung injury in patients, we performed a systematic review examining this question in animal models. Methods Studies retrieved from systematic literature searches of three databases, that compared the effects of exposure to FiO_2 ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 vs. FiO_2 = 0.21 for ≥ 24 h in adult in vivo animal models including an inflammatory challenge or not were analyzed. Survival, body weight and/or lung injury measures were included in meta-analysis if reported in ≥ 3 studies. Results More than 600 retrieved reports investigated only FiO_2s > 0.60 and were not analyzed. Ten studies with an inflammatory challenge (6 infectious and 4 noninfectious) and 14 studies without, investigated FiO_2s ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 and were analyzed separately. In seven studies with an inflammatory challenge, compared to FiO_2 = 0.21, FiO_2 ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 had consistent effects across animal types on the overall odds ratio of survival (95%CI) that was on the side of harm but not significant [0.68 (0.38,1.23), p = 0.21; I ^2 = 0%, p = 0.57]. However, oxygen exposure times were only 1d in 4 studies and 2–4d in another. In a trend approaching significance, FiO_2 ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 with an inflammatory challenge…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free