Evidence Hub

Statins and outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia: population based prospective cohort study

Sumit R. Majumdar, Finlay Aleck McAlister, Dean T. Eurich, Raj S. Padwal, Thomas James Marrie

BMJ, 2006

3,415 participants · 272 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether statins reduce mortality or need for admission to intensive care in patients admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia; and to assess whether previously reported improvements in sepsis related outcomes were a result of the healthy user effect. DESIGN: Population based prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six hospitals in Capital Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted to hospital with pneumonia and categorised according to use of statins for at least one week before admission and during hospital stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite of in-hospital mortality or admission to an intensive care unit. RESULTS: Of 3415 patients with pneumonia admitted to hospital, 624 (18%) died or were admitted to an intensive care unit. Statin users were less likely to die or be admitted to an intensive care unit than non-users (50/325 (15%) v 574/3090 (19%), odds ratio 0.80, P=0.15). After more complete adjustment for confounding, however, the odds ratios changed from potential benefit (0.78, adjusted for age and sex) to potential harm (1.10, fully adjusted including propensity scores, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.60). CONCLUSIONS: Statins are not associated with reduced mortality or need for admission to an intensive care unit in patients with pneumonia; reports of benefit in the setting of sepsis may be a result of confounding.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,415 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free