Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of colistin plus meropenem therapy for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia

Moradi H, Sajadi-Javan ZS, Mousavi S, Rostami S, Moradi Khaniabadi B

Iranian journal of microbiology, 2024

991 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background and objectives: Nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria presents a significant challenge for healthcare systems, as there are limited effective treatments available. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the outcomes of colistin plus meropenem combination therapy on nosocomial pneumonia.

Materials and methods: An exhaustive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Embase databases was conducted, resulting in the extraction of 5 studies for qualitative assessment and meta-analysis. The study sample included 991 patients admitted with nosocomial pneumonia. The outcomes evaluated were clinical improvement, microbiological response, mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, procalcitonin (PCT) levels, and intensive care unit (ICU) duration.

Results: The results demonstrated that colistin plus meropenem combination therapy significantly improved clinical outcomes (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04-1.81, p = 0.027), reduced SOFA scores (OR = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.11, p = 0.001), and increased CCI scores (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.02-0.29, p = 0.021) compared to other medications. However, other evaluated parameters did not show significant differences.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that colistin-meropenem…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 991 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free