Evidence Hub

Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis: An Integrated Study of 503 Cases with Emphasis on Drug Culprits, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Treatment

Lv X, Song Z, Xia W, Zhu L, Ruan S, Lin M, Huang J, Chen H et al.

Journal of inflammation research, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an acute extensive erythematous pustular eruption. Integrated analyses including Asian cohorts remain scarce.

Methods: A total of 503 AGEP cases were analyzed by combining two distinct, routinely-collected data cohorts: (1) a literature-derived cohort (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI) and (2) a hospital-based clinical cohort from a tertiary-care center in China. The hospital cohort data were collected retrospectively from January 2015 to July 2025. Demographic, etiologic, clinical, laboratory and therapeutic characteristics were summarized. Drugs were stratified by median latency (3 days) into short- versus long-latency groups to explore class-specific patterns.

Results: Drugs triggered 94.6% of cases, mainly β-lactam antibiotics (20.7%), non-β-lactam antibiotics (16.3%), and hydroxychloroquine (10.4%). With a 3-day median latency threshold, antibiotic-related reactions showed short latency, whereas antimalarials, analgesics, and antifungals exhibited longer latency. Hospitalization occurred in 75.1%, and systemic involvement in 20.2% (mostly hepatic or renal). Mucosal lesions were infrequent (oral 8.7%, genital 1.8%). Among those tested, patch tests were positive in 71.6%. Systemic corticosteroids were the mainstay (63.8%) of treatment, with cyclosporine (3.7%) and intravenous immunoglobulin (2.5%) used as adjuncts. A few…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free