Evidence Hub

Medication adherence, related factors and outcomes among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review

Antoine Le Bozec, V. Korb-Savoldelli, C. Boiteau, A. Dechartres, Salma Al Kahf, Olivier Sitbon, D. Montani, X. Jaïs et al.

European Respiratory Review, 2024

22 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Graphical Abstract AE: adverse event; CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; MA: medication adherence; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; PH: pulmonary hypertension. Introduction Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are life-threatening conditions that can progress to death without treatment. Although strong medication adherence (MA) is known to enhance outcomes in chronic illnesses, its association with PAH and CTEPH was sporadically explored. This study aims to examine the MA of patients with PAH or CTEPH, identify factors associated with low adherence and explore the resulting outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar) from 6 March 1998 to 6 July 2023. We included studies reporting MA as primary or secondary end-points. Study selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Results 20 studies involving 22 675 patients met the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was observed, particularly in the methods employed. MA means ranged from 0.62 to 0.96, with the proportion of patients exhibiting high MA varying from 40% (95% CI 35–45%) to 94% (95% CI 88–97%). Factors associated with low adherence included increased treatment frequency, time since diagnosis and co-payment. High MA seems to be associated with reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free