Evidence Hub

Whole-genome sequencing and genomic characterization of a novel multi-drug resistant esxA-positive Staphylococcus haemolyticus DUEML1 (ST-184) isolated from a respiratory infection case: insights from panresistome analysis

Anik TA, Islam F, Uzzaman R, Begum SA, Akhter H, Begum A

BMC microbiology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus haemolyticus is a coagulase-negative staphylococcal species and an opportunistic pathogen associated with hospital-acquired infections. The aim of this study was to use whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize a novel multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. haemolyticus strain, DUEML1 (ST-184), isolated from a respiratory infection case in Bangladesh, and to place its resistome and virulence features in the context of global S. haemolyticus isolates. METHODS: The isolate was obtained in pure culture from the tracheal aspirate of a 51-year-old male patient with respiratory infection, suggesting it was the primary causative agent. WGS was the primary method to analyze the genome of the isolated strain and subsequent in-silico analyses were performed to identify antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors, plasmid-associated genes, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and prophages. Comparative pan-resistome analysis was conducted using 694 publicly available S. haemolyticus genomes retrieved from NCBI. RESULTS: The isolate exhibited in vitro resistance to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, doxycycline, gentamicin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, as determined by the disc diffusion test, and demonstrated the capacity for biofilm formation. Several antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) such as fosBx1, mgrA, norC, sdrM, sepA and two virulence genes, including esxA and cap8G were detected. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free