Evidence Hub

Probiotics to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults with acute non‑anoxic brain injury: Study Protocol for a Double-Blind Multicenter Randomized International Clinical Trial (PROACT)

Alberto Corriero, Rossana Soloperto, M. Giglio, M. Salvagno, P. Trerotoli, Salvatore Grasso, Mario Ribezzi, Adriana Mosca et al.

Trials, 2025

208 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a significant complication among critically ill patients, with associated mortality approaching 50%. Despite the implementation of established preventive strategies, additional interventions are urgently needed to further reduce the incidence of VAP. Probiotic therapy has emerged as a promising adjunctive approach; the benefits of probiotic therapy may be more pronounced in critically ill patients without pre-existing infections. The PROACT study will evaluate the prophylactic role of probiotics in a critically ill population with acute brain injury to reduce the VAP incidence, while also exploring microbiological endpoints and mortality to refine patient selection criteria. The PROACT study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic prophylaxis in adult critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation following acute brain injury (e.g., head trauma, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke). Patients with suspected pulmonary aspiration or pre-existing pulmonary infections at enrollment are excluded to reduce confounding. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a placebo (glucose polymer) or a probiotic formulation containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium lactis BB12, and Saccharomyces boulardii. The assigned intervention is administered twice daily via nasogastric tube and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 208 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free