Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing On-Pump CABG: The POST-CABGDM Randomized Clinical Trial

F. Pitta, Eduardo Gomes Lima, C. A. Tavares, E. Martins, F. Rached, E. Moreira, B. M. Mioto, S. Lottenberg et al.

Diabetes Care, 2025

145 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing elective on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Investigator-initiated, pragmatic, single-center, randomized, open-label trial with blinded outcome adjudication conducted in Brazil. A total of 145 patients with T2DM scheduled for elective on-pump CABG were randomized to receive empagliflozin 25 mg daily plus standard care (n = 71) for at least 3 months, which was discontinued 72 h before surgery, or to received standard care alone (n = 74). The primary outcome was postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) within 7 days of surgery, defined by creatinine-based criteria (namely, Acute Kidney Injury Network; Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Kidney Function, and End-Stage Kidney Disease; or Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative atrial fibrillation and type 5 myocardial infarction (MI). Safety outcomes were ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and wound infection within 30 days after CABG.

RESULTS

AKI occurred in 22.5% of the empagliflozin group vs. 39.1% in the control group (relative risk [RR] 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.96]; P = 0.03). Rates of atrial fibrillation (15.4% vs. 13.5%; RR 1.15 [95% CI 0.52-2.53]; P = 0.73) and type 5 MI (1.4% vs. 4.1%; RR 0.35 [95% CI 0.04-3.26]; P = 0.62) were similar between groups. No statistically significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free