Evidence Hub

Occupational Community-Acquired Pneumonia in a Fitter-Splicer with a Significant Smoking History: A Case Report and Expanded Review of the Literature

Anthony Suranta Surbakti, Agus Juanda

International journal of medical science and health research, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a primary driver of global morbidity and mortality, with its incidence heavily influenced by host and environmental factors. While the roles of age, comorbidities, and smoking are well-established, the contribution of occupational exposures—particularly the complex and synergistic hazards faced by industrial workers—remains a critical and often under-appreciated component of risk assessment. This report presents an in-depth analysis of a fitter-splicer, a profession with a unique combination of respiratory hazards, who developed CAP, providing a platform to explore the intricate relationship between workplace environment, lifestyle factors, and infectious disease susceptibility.

Case Illustration: A 50-year-old male with a 30-pack-year smoking history presented with a one-week history of a worsening productive cough, persistent fever, right-sided pleuritic chest pain, and a significant episode of hemoptysis. Physical examination revealed focal findings over the right lower lung, including decreased tactile fremitus, diminished breath sounds, and localized rhonchi, indicative of parenchymal consolidation. Laboratory investigations showed marked neutrophilic leukocytosis and a profoundly elevated C-reactive protein level (165 mg/L). A chest radiograph confirmed dense consolidation in the right lower lobe, consistent with lobar pneumonia. Despite being stratified as low severity by both the CURB-65 and Pneumonia Severity Index…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free