Evidence Hub

Genomic Characterization and Virulence Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates from Pneumonia Patients in Karaganda, Kazakhstan

S. Orkara, V. Strochkov, A. Lavrinenko, N. Sandybayev

Antibiotics, 2026

7 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant strains, is a leading cause of severe pneumonia. Understanding local molecular epidemiology, including virulence gene profiles and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mechanisms, is crucial for effective infection control. This pilot study aimed to characterize S. aureus isolates from pneumonia patients in Karaganda, Kazakhstan. Methods: We collected 48 respiratory samples from patients with pneumonia across three medical institutions. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was carried out using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Whole-genome sequencing of S. aureus isolates was conducted on an Ion Torrent S5 platform. Genomic analysis included multilocus sequence typing (MLST), identification of virulence and AMR genes, and phylogenetic reconstruction. Results: S. aureus was identified in 14.6% (n = 7) of pneumonia cases included in this study. All isolates (100%, n = 7) were phenotypically resistant to benzylpenicillin. The mecA gene was detected in 57.1% of isolates (n = 4), while phenotypic resistance to methicillin was observed in 28.6% (n = 2) of the isolates. Resistance to azithromycin (57.1%, n = 4) and levofloxacin (42.9%, n = 3) was observed among the isolates. Two isolates (28.6%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Genomic analysis revealed the prevalence of the ST22 clone (57.1%, n =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free