Evidence Hub

Vascular responses to molecular migraine triggers: a systematic review of magnetic resonance angiography studies

Arquizan R, Melchior AG, Christensen RH, Al-Khazali HM, Ashina M, Ashina H

The journal of headache and pain, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and interpret magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) findings on vascular changes after administration of established molecular migraine triggers in adults with migraine and in healthy individuals, focusing on the middle meningeal artery (MMA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA).

METHODS: A systematic review of experimental studies using MRA to assess extracerebral and intracerebral arterial responses to established molecular migraine triggers was conducted. Eligible studies included adults with migraine or healthy volunteers, use of MRA, and oral ingestion or intravenous infusion of an established molecular migraine trigger. Studies not meeting these criteria, as well as conference abstracts, preprints, reviews, case reports, and case series, were excluded.

RESULTS: Sixteen eligible MRA studies were identified. The triggers used included calcitonin gene-related peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides (PACAP-27 and PACAP-38), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, nitroglycerin, cilostazol, sildenafil, and levcromakalim. All triggers induced extracerebral (meningeal) arterial dilation, often accompanied by headache or migraine attacks. Dilation induced by neuropeptides was confined to extracerebral arteries, consistent with limited blood-brain barrier penetration. In contrast, nitroglycerin and levcromakalim also dilated cerebral arteries. Across all studies, sumatriptan consistently reversed extracerebral arterial dilation and alleviated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free