Evidence Hub

A Case of Legionella Pneumonia Suspected as Typical Pneumonia After Lung Cancer Surgery, Diagnosed by a Repeat Urinary Legionella Antigen Test

Y. Nabe, H. Mizuuchi, Masaaki Inoue, Junichi Yoshida

Cureus, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Legionella pneumophila is a leading cause of severe atypical pneumonia and is associated with high mortality when initial treatment is inadequate. The urinary Legionella antigen test serves as a rapid, first-line diagnostic tool; however, early results may be negative, and antigen shedding can be intermittent. In these situations, timely retesting is essential, especially in postoperative or high-risk patients. We report the case of a 74-year-old man, a former smoker with diabetes and moderate aortic stenosis, who underwent thoracoscopic left lower lobectomy and was discharged on postoperative day (POD) six. He developed a fever on POD 27, accompanied by right upper lobe pneumonia. Outpatient urinary antigen tests for pneumococcus and Legionella were negative, and oral garenoxacin was initiated. However, hypoxemia and inflammation worsened, resulting in urgent admission on POD 30. Broad-spectrum β-lactams (sulbactam/ampicillin, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam) were ineffective. Chest CT revealed enlarging infiltrates and a parapneumonic effusion requiring drainage, despite negative pleural fluid cultures. Given the persistent deterioration of the patient's condition, levofloxacin was added, and the urinary Legionella antigen test (R70829, MIZUHO MEDY Co., Ltd., Tosu, Japan) was repeated on hospital day five (POD 35), which returned positive, confirming Legionella pneumonia. Subsequent targeted therapy with azithromycin (days 6-8 and 13-15), alongside levofloxacin,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free