Evidence Hub

Long-Term Treatment with Single-Tablet Combination of Macitentan and Tadalafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Results from A DUE and Its Open-Label Period

Ford HJ, Chin KM, Fan F, Friberg M, Grünig E, Hauser JA, Pannaux M, Rofael H et al.

Advances in therapy, 2026

185 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the A DUE study, a fixed-dose combination of macitentan 10 mg and tadalafil 40 mg (M/T FDC) as a single tablet significantly improved pulmonary vascular resistance at Week 16 versus corresponding monotherapies in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Safety was consistent with known profiles of macitentan and tadalafil. The open-label (OL) period of A DUE provides long-term safety/efficacy data for M/T FDC.

METHODS: In A DUE (NCT03904693), patients were randomized (2:1:1) to double-blind M/T FDC, macitentan 10 mg or tadalafil 40 mg and followed for 16 weeks. They then transitioned to OL M/T FDC and were followed for up to 2 years to end of study (EOS). Efficacy analyses, including survival, changes in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline, are reported in patients randomized to M/T FDC at start of A DUE (efficacy set). Safety is reported for all patients receiving M/T FDC at any time during the double-blind (DB) and/or OL (safety set).

RESULTS: In A DUE, 185 patients received M/T FDC for median (range) of 105.1 (0.6, 182.6) weeks. In the efficacy set, 91% of patients were alive at EOS. Mean (SD) change in 6MWD from M/T FDC initiation to OL Week 120 was 60.5 m (84.2). For NT-proBNP, geometric mean percent of baseline was 50.2% at OL Week 120. In the safety set, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 94.1% and serious AEs in 33.5% of patients; 10.3% discontinued study treatment due to an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 185 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free