Evidence Hub

The Effect of Oral Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors on Sperm Parameters: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Tan P, Liu L, Wei S, Tang Z, Yang L, Wei Q

Urology, 2017

1,317 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors on sperm parameters.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. Mean value and its standard deviation (mean ± standard deviation) were used to perform quantitative analysis. Statistic heterogeneity scores were assessed with the standard Cochran Q test and I2 statistic. All statistical analyses were conducted by RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS: Eleven studies embraced a total of 1317 participants and 19 subgroups or trials were included. Acute administration of PDE5 inhibitors had no effect on semen volume (mean value [MD] = 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00-0.48) and sperm concentration (MD = 2.04; 95%CI: -2.95 to 7.04). However, the percentage of motile spermatozoa (MD = 7.05; 95%CI: 2.59-11.51), the percentage of total progressive motility (MD = 6.23; 95%CI: 2.43-10.04), and rapid progressive motility (MD = 3.11; 95%CI: 0.23-5.99) were increased after oral PDE5 inhibitors treatment. Interestingly, these significant changes were observed only in infertile men but not in normal patients (MD = 6.89, P .05; and MD = 3.89, P = .04 vs MD = 0.92, P = .59, respectively). The percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa also increased in infertile men (MD = 12.15; 95%CI: 5.16-19.15). Limited evidence showed the linearity, abnormal forms of spermatozoa, as well as reproductive hormones (total testosterone, free testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,317 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free