Evidence Hub

An evidence-based approach to writing reviews as illustrated by treatment of erectile dysfunction

Apolikhin OP, Abdullin II

Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999), 2005

Abstract

Reviews integrate the data from original sources of information on the given topic. The quality of the review of literature depends on the quality of initial information. The development of evidence-based medicine demands higher standards from clinical trials. The authors analyse available information on the treatment of erectile dysfunction basing on standard international requirements for clinical trials. A checking list is available for standardization of clinical assessment. The data obtained is ranged by the degree of statistical significance. Basing on the evidence-based approach, the conclusion on efficacy of the following modern drugs in the treatment of erectile dysfunction are made: sildenafil, iochimbin, prostaglandin E1 and tadalafil. The conclusion on efficacy of the other drugs against erectile dysfunction is impossible in view of methodological drawbacks of the trials.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free