Evidence Hub

Vasodilators for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: A network meta-analysis

Luo K, Tang J, Chen H, Zhang X, Wang H

Pediatric pulmonology, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of different vasodilators in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) by a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS: We searched databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) from January, 1990 up to December, 2023. Randomized controlled trials on the use of vasodilators in the treatment of PPHN. We extracted details of population, intervention, and outcome indicators. R and STATA software were used for data analysis. Sixteen articles were included, encompassing 776 neonates with PPHN. Among them, 12 articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The vasodilators included Sildenafil, Bosentan, Milrinone, Magnesium, Adenosine, and Tadalafil.

RESULTS: The Bayesian network meta-analysis results suggested that compared to placebo, Milrinone [OR = 0.125, 95% CI (0.0261, 0.562)], Sildenafil [OR = 0.144, 95% CI (0.0428, 0.420)], and Sildenafil_Milrinone [OR = 0.0575, 95% CI (0.00736, 0.364)] reduced the mortality, but the difference among the three was not significant. There was also no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation among the vasodilators. Compared to Bosentan, Adenosine was more effective in reducing the oxygenation index [MD = -12.78, 95% CI (-25.56, -0.03)], and Magnesium was less effective in reducing the oxygenation index than Sildenafil [MD = 5.19, 95% CI (1.23,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free