Evidence Hub

The influence of pre-stenting and drugs on the outcomes of ureteroscopy for kidney and ureteral stone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the EAU Section of Endourology

Yuen SKK, Castellani D, Tokas T, Pirola GM, Giulioni C, Kwok JL, Lakmichi MA, Yanagisawa T et al.

World journal of urology, 2025

15 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteroscopy serves as a minimally invasive surgical treatment option for ureteral and kidney stones but is not without technical challenges. Pre-stenting and medical therapies, such as alpha-blockers, may improve outcomes by facilitating ureteral access sheath placements and reducing complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of pre-stenting and preoperative pharmacological agents on ureteroscopy outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases, identifying randomized controlled trials comparing ureteroscopy outcomes with and without pre-stenting and pre-ureteroscopy medical therapy. Primary outcomes included failure rates in accessing the upper urinary tract, while secondary outcomes encompassed operative times, complications, and stone-free rates.

Results: The analysis included 16 randomized controlled trials, revealing that pre-stenting and medical therapy significantly reduced failure rates (Relative Ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59, p < 0.001) and operative times (Mean Difference -10.81 min, 95% CI -13.45 to -8.18, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a higher stone-free rates, lower need for postoperative stenting and fewer complications associated with preoperative ureteral dilation interventions.

Conclusion: Preoperative alpha blockers enhance ureteroscopy success and reduces complications.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free