Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of targeted drugs for pulmonary hypertension to improve exercise tolerance and associated factors in eisenmenger syndrome

Yuan Z, Wang Y, Wang J, Lai Y, Dan X, Wang J

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025

393 participants

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) targeting drugs on exercise tolerance in Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) and analyze related factors.

Methods: Two researchers conducted an independent search of the Chinese database and the English database, and conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria respectively. According to the heterogeneity test results, the effect model was adopted for analysis by RevMan5.4 statistical software, in which the continuity data were represented by mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: A total of 393 patients with ES were included in 13 papers, including 8 studies of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA), 2 studies of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) and 3 studies of prostanoids. The results of these studies showed that the targeted drugs were effective in improving exercise tolerance in ES patients. Further analyses revealed that the differences in efficacy were related to the type of targeted drug, duration of drug treatment and the presence or absence of Down syndrome (DS). 6MWD (6 min Walk Distance) and cardiac function were significantly improved in ES patients with all three classes of drugs. Prostanoids (MD = 132.35, 95% CI: 14.82-249.89, P 2 = 93%) improved 6MWD better than ERAs (MD = 41.60, 95% CI: 21.76-61.44, P 2 = 32%) and PDE5i (MD = 52.33, 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 393 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free