Evidence Hub

Low-dose versus high-dose intravenous nitroglycerin in the treatment of sympathetic crashing acute pulmonary oedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on efficacy, safety and outcomes

Pramudyo M, Kamarullah W, Pranata R, Prameswari HS, Iqbal M, Dewi TI, Hidayat S, Akbar MR

BMJ open, 2025

185 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Sympathetic crashing acute pulmonary oedema (SCAPE) is a menacing medical emergency and a severe form of acute heart failure that requires urgent intervention. Nitroglycerin (NTG) is commonly used in SCAPE management, but the optimal dosing remains uncertain. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of high-dose vs low-dose NTG in SCAPE patients, assessing mechanical ventilation need, symptom resolution, hospital stay and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024527486).

Data sources: A comprehensive search in PubMed, Europe PMC and ScienceDirect up to November 2024. Reference lists of included studies were also reviewed.

Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing high-dose NTG (≥100 mcg/min) with low-dose NTG (<100 mcg/min) in SCAPE patients were included. Key inclusion criteria were acute dyspnoea (<6 hours), systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥160 mmHg, mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥120 mmHg, respiratory rate (RR) ≥30 breaths/min and sympathetic activation. Exclusion criteria included non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, immediate intubation, NTG contraindications, pregnancy and acute coronary syndrome.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 185 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free