Evidence Hub

Follow-Up Functional Class and 6-Minute Walk Distance Identify Long-Term Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Heresi GA, Rao Y

Lung, 2020

563 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend specific treatment goals for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients: functional class I or II, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) ≥ 380 to 440 m, normal natriuretic peptide levels, and normal right-sided invasive hemodynamics. Only observational registry data support this recommendation. Our aim was to test these goals in a large group 1 PAH cohort against long-term survival.

METHODS: We analyzed the PHIRST and TRIUMPH populations (n = 563, age 53.5 ± 14.7 years, female sex 79%). The predictor variables were the treatment goals measured at the end of the placebo-controlled phase (16 and 12 weeks, respectively). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the end of follow-up during the open-label extension phase.

RESULTS: There were 73 deaths during median follow of 1072 days (range 27 to 2177). Patients who achieved a functional class I or II had better survival. Both a 6MWD ≥ 380 m and ≥ 440 m were associated with lower mortality, but survival was better in patients able to walk ≥ 440 m. The best long-term survival was achieved with functional class I or II and 6MWD ≥ 440 m. In a subset of the population, cardiac index > 2.5 L/min/m2 was weakly associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION: WHO functional class I or II, 6MWD ≥ 440 m and CI > 2.5 L/min/m2 measured 12-16 weeks after the introduction of PAH-targeted therapy are associated with better long-term survival in PAH. Best survival is observed by reaching both the functional class and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 563 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free