Evidence Hub

Tadalafil population pharmacokinetics in patients with erectile dysfunction

Trocóniz IF, Tillmann C, Staab A, Rapado J, Forgue ST

European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007

227 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize pharmacokinetics of tadalafil (Cialis) and potential sources of variability in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS: Population models were developed to describe tadalafil pharmacokinetics in 227 patients with mild to severe ED in a phase III trial. Parallel groups of patients received 2, 5, or 10 mg tadalafil or placebo orally, as needed, for 12 weeks.

RESULTS: Tadalafil pharmacokinetics in patients with ED were linear with respect to dose and duration of treatment, and a one-compartment model adequately described the data. The absorption rate was rapid (1.86 h(-1)), and the typical population estimates of the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution were 1.6 l/h and 63.8 l, respectively. Disposition parameters showed a moderate degree of interindividual variability (39-45%). The value of CL/F decreased slightly with increasing serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) concentration, the only statistically significant covariate detected. Systemic exposure to tadalafil was not influenced by age, weight, smoking status, alcohol consumption, liver enzyme status, ED severity, cardiovascular condition, or diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetics in the efficacy/safety trial population are essentially similar to pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, and no patient-specific factor warranting clinical consideration of dose regimen adjustment was identified in these analyses.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 227 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free