Evidence Hub

Sex differences in response to tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Mathai SC, Hassoun PM, Puhan MA, Zhou Y, Wise RA

Chest, 2015

405 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Current therapies improve symptoms, functional capacity, and, in select cases, survival. Little is known about patient factors that may predict the likelihood of patient-important, clinically relevant responses to therapy such as the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS: Data from the randomized clinical trial of tadalafil in PAH were used. Adjusted logistic regression models were created to examine the relationship between baseline characteristics and odds of achieving the minimal important difference (MID) in three parameters, defined as either a > 33-m increase in 6MWD, a > 5-unit increase in physical component summary score of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), or a > 5-unit increase in mental component summary score of the SF-36.

RESULTS: The study included 405 subjects. Younger age, male sex, lower baseline 6MWD, and disease etiology were associated with greater odds of achieving the MID for the 6-min walk test. Active treatment, younger age, and male sex were associated with greater odds of achieving the MID for the physical component summary score. Male sex was associated with greater odds of achieving the MID for the mental component summary score.

CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, baseline functional capacity, and disease etiology are variably associated with the likelihood of achieving clinically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 405 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free