Evidence Hub

Positive Predictors for Response to Ambrisentan Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Hatano M, Abe K, Koike G, Takahashi T, Tunmer G, Kiely DG

International heart journal, 2022

605 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

The AMBITION study (NCT01178073) provided the first long-term clinical evidence for initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Nevertheless, predictors of treatment response were not assessed.To identify predictors for response to initial combination therapy, we examined data from 302 patients with PAH (World Health Organization Functional Class II or III) who received initial combination therapy from the modified intention-to-treat population of the AMBITION study (n = 605). A responder was defined as not having undergone a clinical failure event. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Multivariate logistic regression with interactive backward selection was used to assess the independent association of potential predictors with response.Treatment responders were younger, more often female, and less likely to have comorbidities or a requirement for oxygen therapy, compared with nonresponders. At multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29, 5.52; P = 0.0081), longer 6-minute walk distance (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00, 1.01; P = 0.0039), lower baseline log N-terminal-prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52, 0.94; P = 0.0190), and aldosterone antagonist use (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.03, 6.26; P = 0.0436) independently predicted response to initial combination therapy.Besides demographic factors, the absence of comorbidities and less severe…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 605 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free