Evidence Hub

A sham-controlled randomised trial of pulmonary artery denervation for Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension: one-year outcomes of the PADN-CFDA trial

Kan J, Zhang H, Xie D, Wei Y, Zhang J, Zhang C, Yang Z, Gu H et al.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023

128 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: Long-term clinical outcomes after pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) in patients with Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have not been reported.

Aims: We aimed to investigate the effect of PADN on 1-year outcomes in patients with PAH.

Methods: In the multicentre PADN-CFDA trial, 128 patients with Group 1 PAH were randomly assigned to PADN plus a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) versus a sham PADN procedure plus a PDE-5i. The principal endpoint of interest for the present study was clinical worsening at 1 year after randomisation, the composite of worsening of PAH (increase in WHO functional class, need for additional PAH treatments or PAH-related hospitalisation), atrial septostomy, listing for lung transplantation, or all-cause death.

Results: One-year clinical follow-up was available in all patients. At 1 year, clinical worsening had occurred in 3 (4.8%) patients in the PADN plus PDE-5i group and in 15 patients (23.1%) in the sham plus PDE-5i group (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.60; p=0.006), driven by significantly increased rates of PAH-related hospitalisations, worsening functional class and the requirement for additional PAH treatments in the sham group. Results were consistent in high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk patients (pinteraction=0.186). Patients treated with PADN plus PDE-5i had an improvement in the between-group change in the six-minute walking distance (6MWD) from baseline to 1 year of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 128 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free