Evidence Hub

Randomized study of adding tadalafil to existing ambrisentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Zhuang Y, Jiang B, Gao H, Zhao W

Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2014

124 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral tadalafil in patients receiving background ambrisentan therapy. Current treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remain insufficient, resulting in high mortality rates. The addition of oral tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, to background ambrisentan may provide a safe and effective therapeutic strategy. A total of 124 patients who had been treated with ambrisentan for at least 4 months and had a stable 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) for at least 1 month were randomized to either the oral tadalafil or placebo group. Treatment differences in 6MWD, changes in FC, clinical worsening (CW) and adverse events were analyzed after 16 weeks of treatment. At week 16, the tadalafil group showed a significantly improved exercise capacity as assessed by the 6MWD (P<0.05). In addition, 5 (8.3%) patients receiving tadalafil add-on therapy had CW vs. 15 (23.4%) with placebo (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in adverse events or changes in hemodynamic parameters between the placebo and tadalafil groups. Tadalafil 40 mg was well-tolerated as add-on therapy to background ambrisentan. However, the data from this study are insufficient to prove the additional therapeutic benefits of tadalafil add-on therapy.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free