Evidence Hub

CerebrAlcare Pills on CereBral Small VesseL DiseasE (CABLE) trial: rationale and design

Zhou M, Gong Y, Han S, Wang M, Gu W, Chen HS, Zheng W, Feng K et al.

Stroke and vascular neurology, 2026

114 participants

Abstract

Rationale: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is responsible for 25% of ischaemic strokes and 45% of dementia cases. Currently, therapies targeting individual mechanisms have not shown significant efficacy. As CSVD involves multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, Cerebralcare pills, a traditional Chinese medicine with multiple pharmacological mechanisms, may be effective in treating cognitive dysfunction in CSVD.

Aims: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of Cerebralcare pills in improving cognitive dysfunction (measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)) in patients with CSVD.

Sample size estimates: A sample size of 114 patients with CSVD (57 in each group) will allow 2.74 points (with an SE of 0.56 points) difference between two groups on the MoCA score with 5% significance, 80% power and assuming a 10% dropout rate.

Methods and design: This is a randomised double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial involving individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MoCA score ranging from 16 to 24) associated with CSVD. CSVD was defined by the presence of white matter hyperintensities consistent with lacunar infarcts or the presence of more than two vascular risk factors. Participants were randomised 1:1 to orally take 5 g of Cerebralcare pills or placebo twice a day for 6 months.

Study outcomes: The primary outcome measure is the change in MoCA score at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures include the assessment of clinical manifestations, cognitive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 114 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free