Evidence Hub

Stable Longitudinal Quality of Life in the SERVE Trial Among Adults With Transposition of the Great Arteries and a Systemic Right Ventricle

Castiglione A, Schwerzmann M, Bouchardy J, Buechel RR, Engel R, Freese M, Gabriel H, Greutmann M et al.

CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2025

100 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Adults with a transposition anatomy and a systemic right ventricle (RV) face long-term complications that may impact their quality of life (QoL). Few data are available regarding the QoL in this patient group and its evolution over time.

Methods: This study was performed in the SERVE trial's (identifier: NCT03049540) prospective cohort of patients (n = 100) with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (TGA) or dextro-TGA after the atrial switch procedure and a longitudinal follow-up of 3 years. We aimed to describe the longitudinal QoL levels and their predictors. QoL was assessed using the Linear Analog Scale. QoL parameters were collected at baseline, after 12 months, and after 36 months, together with clinical parameters and a questionnaire assessing general self-efficacy (GSE).

Results: The mean QoL on the Linear Analog Scale was 79.1 ± 13.6 at baseline, 75.5 ± 14.8 at 1 year, and 79.2 ± 13.6 at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.900). No significant differences in QoL were observed between congenitally corrected TGA or dextro-TGA patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing maximum work rate and maximum oxygen uptake, New York Heart Association class, end-diastolic RV volumes, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration, and GSE showed significant correlations with QoL levels. Multivariable regression analysis identified GSE value and New York Heart Association class (r 2 = 0.283, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of QoL at baseline.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free