Evidence Hub

Development of a clinical scoring system to predict response to low-intensity shock wave therapy in clinically diagnosed vasculogenic erectile dysfunction: a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, interventional study

Anıl H, Yıldız A, Topuz AN, Kayra MV, Sözütok S, Altunkol A, Alma E, Topuz M et al.

Sexual medicine, 2026

219 participants

Abstract

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition, with vasculogenic ED being the most common subtype, primarily related to endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk factors. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) has emerged as a promising non-invasive treatment option. However, predictors of treatment response remain poorly defined.

Aim: To identify clinical and vascular predictors of treatment success following Li-ESWT in patients with vasculogenic ED and to develop a novel, practical, and non-invasive scoring system to predict therapeutic response.

Methods: This prospective study included 219 men aged 18-80 years with vasculogenic ED between January 2024 and January 2025. All patients underwent Li-ESWT (18 000 pulses over 3 weeks). Clinical and vascular parameters, including age, ED duration, body mass index, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes mellitus (DM), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), flow-mediated dilation rate (FMD), and prior phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) response, were recorded. Treatment success at 6 months was defined as an increase of ≥1 point in the erection hardness score or ≥5 points in the International Index of Erectile Function-5 EF.

Outcomes: The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months after Li-ESWT. Secondary outcomes included the development and validation of a predictive scoring system.

Results: Treatment success rate was 66.2% (145/219). Independent predictors of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 219 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free