Evidence Hub

Oral pulmonary vasoactive drugs achieve hemodynamic eligibility for liver transplantation in portopulmonary hypertension

Legros L, Chabanne C, Camus C, Fournet M, Houssel-Debry P, Latournerie M, Jezequel C, Rayar M et al.

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2017

20 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) hampers survival of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension and may preclude liver transplantation (LT). Management of such patients with oral pulmonary vasoactive drugs (PVD) has not been standardized. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral PVD for management of POPH.

METHODS: All patients treated by oral PVD (bosentan, ambrisentan, sildenafil, tadalafil) for POPH were retrospectively studied. Significant response was defined for the patients who reached the following LT eligibility criteria: mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) <35mmHg or MPAP between 35 and 50mmHg with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <250dynscm-5.

RESULTS: 20 patients were followed for 38 (19-57) months. Oral PVD improved MPAP (-8 [-19, +2]mmHg), PVR (-201 [-344, -68]dynscm-5) and 6-min walk distance (+52 [-51, +112] m). Fifty-three percent of evaluable patients reached eligibility to LT criteria, of whom 5 were transplanted. Baseline MPAP>51mmHg and/or PVR>536dynscm-5 predicted non response to treatment. Five-years survival was 53%. No worsening of cirrhosis or serious adverse effect was recorded.

CONCLUSION: Oral pulmonary vasoactive drugs are safe in cirrhotic patients with POPH. These treatments improved hemodynamic conditions allowing patients access to liver transplantation eligibility.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free