Evidence Hub

An epidemiological and knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices study of sexually transmitted infections in older men

Tan HH, Wong ML, Chan RK

Singapore medical journal, 2006

104 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to determine the disease patterns of sexually transmitted infections (STI) in older men, as well as to gather information on their knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and sexual practices.

METHODS: A prospective study was carried out from January to June 2005 in men aged 50 years or older who attended the Department of STI Control clinic.

RESULTS: There were 104 men enrolled. The majority (92.3 percent) were Chinese, and 62.5 percent were aged between 50 and 59 years, 25.9 percent between 60 and 69 years, and 11.5 percent aged 70 years or older. The patients were predominantly heterosexual, and had fairly low levels of education--85.6 percent of the patients had received primary or secondary school level of education. Majority (79.8 percent) of the men had been sexually active in the preceding six months, and 37.3 percent had paid sex during that time. 29.8 percent of men reported having taken drugs such as sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) or similar drugs such as vardenafil (Levitra, Bayer, Wuppertal, Germany) or tadalafil (Cialis, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA). 56.7 percent of the men had active infections, with non-gonococcal urethritis (15.4 percent), genital warts (12.5 percent) and gonorrhoea (10.6 percent) being the commonest. Generally, condom usage was accepted as an effective way to prevent transmission of STI. However, many of the men surveyed felt that condom usage reduced their sexual pleasure, and 38.5 percent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 104 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free