Evidence Hub

The economic effect of switching from sildenafil to another phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor

J. Harnett, T. Mclaughlin, J. Mulhall, D. Russell, S. McLean

Managed care interface, 2006

15,584 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Patients who could benefit from additional education about treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED) may prematurely discontinue or switch ED medications, resulting in unnecessary resource utilization. In a retrospective cohort study using a large, aggregated health claims database, the costs associated with switching from sildenafil to another phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor were compared with those for patients refilling sildenafil. Of the 15,584 patients with an index sildenafil claim, 10,863 had a second PDE-5 inhibitor prescription (10,137 for sildenafil, 726 for vardenafil or tadalafil). Erectile dysfunction-attributable costs in the six-month preindex period were similar (P = .72), but postindex six-month ED costs were higher in patients who initially switched from sildenafil (dollar 173.38) versus patients who refilled sildenafil (dollar 131.51; P < .001). Regression analysis estimated that corrected ED-attributable and overall costs were 41% (P < .001) and 43% (P < .001) higher for patients who switched versus those who refilled sildenafil, respectively.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15,584 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free