Evidence Hub

Real-World Outcomes and Safety of Testosterone Therapy: A Longitudinal, Retrospective Cohort Study of Over 9,000 Men

A. Clift, Hans Johnson, David Huang, Abraham Morgentaler

The World Journal of Men's Health, 2026

9,537 participants

Abstract

Purpose Trials of testosterone therapy (TTh) focus on transdermal or intramuscular preparations. In clinical practice, a range of administrations are utilised, often with adjunct therapies, but evidence is limited. This study characterised the safety and effectiveness of TTh over 12 months in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study of adults treated by a men’s health provider in the United Kingdom for testosterone deficiency between 2019 and 2024. Mixed effects models and Kaplan–Meier methodology were used. Changes in total testosterone, free testosterone, haematocrit, and quality of life (QoL; Likert scales of 1–5) domains over 12 months were evaluated overall and by baseline testosterone-defined groups. Results The cohort comprised 9,537 men (median age 42 years). Mean follow-up was 8.47 months. 8,517 were treated with sub-cutaneous testosterone injections (89.20%), 366 were prescribed transdermal testosterone (3.84%), 7,079 were prescribed human chorionic gonadotropin (75.23%), 675 (7.08%) were prescribed clomiphene citrate, and 1,308 (13.72%) were prescribed tadalafil (men may have received >1 treatment). Significant increases were observed in all 8 QoL domains, e.g., +1.26 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.43) for libido. The mean increase in haematocrit by month 12 was 0.03 L/L (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.03). Trends and magnitude of increases in total and free testosterones and QoL did not differ between biochemical categories,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9,537 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free