Evidence Hub

Retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of once-daily tadalafil in patient subgroups: men with mild vs moderate ED and aged <50 vs 50 years

Seftel AD, Shinghal R, Kim ED, Samuels SM, Ni X, Burns PR

International journal of impotence research, 2013

Abstract

The aim of this post-hoc pooled-data analysis was to evaluate the effects of once-daily tadalafil in men with mild or moderate ED and aged <50 or 50 years. Data from three randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Analysis of covariance models included a term for ED severity and age group. The three coprimary outcome measures in the base studies were changes from baseline to end point in the mean International Index of Erectile Function Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score and the mean per-patient percentage successful vaginal penetration and intercourse attempts. Irrespective of baseline severity, once-daily tadalafil 5 mg for 12 weeks compared with placebo significantly increased the mean: (1) IIEF-EF by 6.8; (2) percent successful penetration attempts from 70.1 to 91.3%; and (3) percent successful intercourse attempts from 33.4 to 76.8% (each P<0.001). Treatment-by-age-group interaction P-values for all three coprimary efficacy end points exceeded 0.10, indicating that tadalafil treatment effects did not differ by age <50 vs 50 years. Tadalafil was generally well tolerated.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free