Evidence Hub

Initial tadalafil and ambrisentan combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: cLinical and haemodYnamic long-term efficacy (ITALY study)

D'Alto M, Romeo E, Argiento P, Paciocco G, Prediletto R, Ghio S, Correale M, Lo Giudice F et al.

Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.), 2018

56 participants

Abstract

AIMS: Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil (upfront therapy) offers clinical benefits in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and reduces the risk of clinical failure compared with monotherapy in naïve patients. The aim of study is to assess the efficacy of a 12-month upfront therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil in improving haemodynamics in incident PAH patients.

METHODS: This is a multicentre retrospective analysis of real-world Italian clinical data in 56 patients with newly diagnosed PAH. Clinical evaluations, including demographics, medical history, WHO functional class, 6-min walk distance, and right heart catheterization, were collected from the patients' medical records at baseline and at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS: At baseline, there were 16, 34, and 6 patients in WHO functional class II, III, and IV, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 12 months, 54 (96%) patients were still alive, 6 (11%) of whom received parenteral prostanoids. Ambrisentan-tadalafil combination was associated with significant improvements in WHO functional class (2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6, P < 0.001, improved in 29 patients), exercise capacity (395 ± 123 vs. 353 ± 101 m, P = 0.039), N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (528 ± 493 vs. 829 ± 620 pg/ml; P = 0.009), and haemodynamics (right atrial pressure 7 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 5 mmHg, P = 0.02; mean pulmonary artery pressure 45 ± 15 vs. 50 ± 13 mmHg, P = 0.03; cardiac index 3.0 ± 1.0 vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 l/min/m, P = 0.001;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free