Evidence Hub

Right Ventricular Function Improves With Pulmonary Vasodilator Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension and Multivessel Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in a Single Center Cohort

Avitabile CM, Butler K, Mondal A, Frank DB, Wang Y, Ash D, Mercer-Rosa L, O'Byrne ML et al.

Pulmonary circulation, 2026

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction increase mortality in multivessel pediatric pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS). Pulmonary vasodilator use is limited in PVS due to the perceived risk of pulmonary edema. We aimed to describe our experience with pulmonary vasodilators in PVS and to assess changes in RV function and hemodynamics over time. Children with multi-vessel PVS (≥ 2 veins), mean pulmonary artery pressure > 20 mmHg, indexed pulmonary vascular resistance > 3 iWU, without single ventricle physiology, treated with pulmonary vasodilators from 2014 to 2024 were included in a single center, retrospective case series. RV systolic function was quantified by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (RVFAC), and longitudinal and free wall strain (RVLS, RVFWS). A four-point PVS severity score was calculated from angiographic data. RV function and hemodynamics were compared from baseline to the most recent by Wilcoxon rank sum tests, controlling for change in PVS severity score. Thirty-one patients (median (IQR) gestational age 27.1 (26.0, 35.9) weeks, birth weight 770 (540, 1900) grams) met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 27.0 (10.5, 71.5) months. Most (65%) had Group 3, lung disease-related PH. One patient developed pulmonary edema requiring medication discontinuation. TAPSE, RVFAC, RVLS, and RVFWS improved significantly (p < 0.01 for all), independent of change in PVS severity score. Survivors…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free