Evidence Hub

Exploratory disproportionality analysis of potentially drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia using United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system

Kamath A

Scientific reports, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is an uncommon adverse drug reaction. Many drugs have been reported to cause EP, the evidence mainly being in the form of case reports/case series. This study aims to conduct an exploratory analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database to identify previously unknown drugs that can cause EP and supplement the available evidence for known culprit drugs. A retrospective case-noncase study was conducted using individual case safety reports (ICSRs) reported to the US FAERS from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. Cases of potentially drug-induced EP were identified using OpenVigil application by conducting a narrow and broad scope search using the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities preferred terms. A base list of drugs described in select literature to have caused EP was used to categorize known and unknown drugs. A disproportionality analysis was performed, with a reporting odds ratio > 2, lower end of the 95% confidence interval > 1, and a minimum of 3 reported cases considered a signal of disproportionate reporting (SDR). During the study period, 8,702,548 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were submitted to the FAERS. Of these, 855 ICSRs using the narrow scope search and 1411 ICSRs using the broad scope search reported EP. The three most commonly reported drugs with an SDR for EP using the narrow scope search were daptomycin, naltrexone, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free