Evidence Hub

Initial and programmed combination therapy with oral drugs for severe idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Maki H, Yao A, Inaba T, Shiga T, Hatano M, Kinugawa K, Yamashita T, Aizawa T et al.

International heart journal, 2011

Abstract

A 49-year-old woman suffering from rapidly progressing right-sided heart failure assessed as World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC) IV is described. After treatment with oxygen and diuretics, she was in WHO-FC III on admission to our hospital, as confirmed by her poor exercise tolerance in cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Upon detailed examination, she was diagnosed as having idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). Right heart catheterization (RHC) revealed severe pulmonary hypertension (mPAP = 65 mmHg) with a markedly decreased cardiac index (CI = 1.0 L/minute/m(2)), and an acute vasoreactivity test with nitric oxide inhalation did not show any response. Due to her severe condition, we decided to attempt oral combination therapy consisting of bosentan, tadalafil, and beraprost, prescribed in the same order and titrated up to their maximum respective doses, instead of intravenous (IV) epoprostenol therapy. Her clinical symptoms improved day by day, and the hemodynamic parameters recovered to nearly normal ranges about 6 months after initiation of the combination therapy. Initial/programmed oral combination therapy for severe IPAH patients is not yet fully established, and there is less evidence concerning its efficacy than IV epoprostenol therapy. However, it has tremendous advantages for PAH patients when they respond well. It is very important to further identify what types of PAH patients will respond to this oral combination therapy and should be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free